Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano
1.
Intern Med ; 62(9): 1323-1328, 2023 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2236168

RESUMO

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and is frequently accompanied by various sequelae. Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are observed in COVID-19 pneumonia patients after recovery, probably due to persistent inflammation in the lungs. We herein report a case of ILD with anti-signal recognition particle antibodies following severe COVID-19 pneumonia. The patient was diagnosed with ILD three months after COVID-19 pneumonia. Although the exact mechanism is unknown, the autoantibody-induced immune response might have been the pulmonary fibrosis trigger in this patient.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais , Humanos , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/patologia , Partícula de Reconhecimento de Sinal , SARS-CoV-2 , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/complicações , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/diagnóstico , Pulmão/patologia , Fibrose
2.
Jpn J Infect Dis ; 75(5): 504-510, 2022 Sep 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2040400

RESUMO

Factors associated with mortality are important in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is the gold standard for diagnosing COVID-19, which reflects the viral load in the upper respiratory tract. In total, 523 patients were enrolled in this study; of them, 441 and 75 patients underwent PCR testing of nasopharyngeal swabs and sputum samples, respectively, within 20 days from onset of COVID-19. We investigated the association between RNA copy number and the COVID-19 severity and mortality rate and its effect on the predictive performance for severity and mortality. RNA copy numbers in nasopharyngeal swabs were higher in the non-survivor group than in the survivor group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified that the high RNA copy number (≥9 log10 /swab) in nasopharyngeal swabs was a factor associated with mortality (odds ratio, 4.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.510-13.100; P = 0.008). Furthermore, adding RNA copy number (≥9 log10 /swab) in severe cases, adjusted by duration from onset to PCR, improved mortality predictive performance based on known factors. The RNA copy number is a factor associated with the mortality of patients with COVID-19 and can improve the predictive performance of mortality in severe cases.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Teste para COVID-19 , Variações do Número de Cópias de DNA , Humanos , Nasofaringe , RNA Viral/genética , SARS-CoV-2/genética
3.
J Infect Chemother ; 27(6): 857-863, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1085523

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There are few agents that have been proven effective for COVID-19. Predicting clinical improvement as well as mortality or severity is very important. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the factors associated with the clinical improvement of COVID-19. METHODS: Overall, 74 patients receiving treatment for COVID-19 at Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital from April 6th to May 15th, 2020 were included in this study. Clinical improvement was evaluated, which defined as the decline of two levels on a six-point ordinal scale of clinical status or discharge alive from the hospital within 28 days after admission. The clinical courses were particularly investigated and the factors related to time to clinical improvement were analyzed with the log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients required oxygen support during hospitalization, 22 patients required invasive mechanical ventilation, and 5 patients required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. A total of 83% of cases reached clinical improvement. Longer period of time from onset to admission (≥10 days) (HR, 1.057; 95% CI, 1.002-1.114), no hypertension (HR, 2.077; 95% CI, 1.006-4.287), and low D-dimer levels (<1 µg/ml) (HR, 2.372; 95% CI, 1.229-4.576) were confirmed to be significant predictive factors for time to clinical improvement. Furthermore, a lower SARS-CoV-2 RNA copy number was also a predictive factor for clinical improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Several predictors for the clinical improvement of COVID-19 pneumonia were identified. These results may be important for the management of COVID-19 pneumonia.


Assuntos
COVID-19/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Feminino , Produtos de Degradação da Fibrina e do Fibrinogênio/análise , Hospitalização , Humanos , Hipertensão , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , RNA Viral/isolamento & purificação , Respiração Artificial , Tóquio
4.
J Infect Chemother ; 27(2): 284-290, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-856866

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The prediction of COVID-19 disease behavior in the early phase of infection is challenging but urgently needed. MuLBSTA score is a scoring system that predicts the mortality of viral pneumonia induced by a variety of viruses, including coronavirus, but the scoring system has not been verified in novel coronavirus pneumonia. The aim of this study was to validate this scoring system for estimating the risk of disease worsening in patients with COVID-19. METHODS: This study included the patients who were treated between April 1 st and March 13 th , 2020. The patients were classified into mild, moderate, and severe groups according to the extent of respiratory failure. MuLBSTA score was applied to estimate the risk of disease worsening in each severity group and we validated the utility of the scoring system. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients were analyzed. Among the 46 patients with mild disease, 17 showed disease progression to moderate or severe disease after admission. The model showed a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of only 34.5% with a cut-off value of 5 points. Among the 55 patients with mild or moderate disease, 6 deteriorated to severe disease, and the model showed a sensitivity of 83.3% and a specificity of 71.4% with a cut-off value of 11 points. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that MuLBSTA score is a potentially useful tool for predicting COVID-19 disease behavior. This scoring system may be used as one of the criteria to identify high-risk patients worsening to life-threatening status.


Assuntos
COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/patologia , Progressão da Doença , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Infecções Bacterianas/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Técnicas e Procedimentos Diagnósticos/normas , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Contagem de Linfócitos/normas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumonia Viral/mortalidade , Insuficiência Respiratória/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fumar/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA